Skip to content

MTA-STS Misconfiguration

MTA-STS Misconfiguration

Description

MTA-STS is a security protocol that enables mail servers to declare their ability to receive Transport Layer Security (TLS) secure SMTP connections. Misconfigurations in MTA-STS can compromise email security, lead to delivery failures, and expose organizations to downgrade attacks. The following areas are key concerns in MTA-STS configuration:

1. Policy File Format

MTA-STS policies must be served over HTTPS and located at .well-known/mta-sts.txt. Common misconfigurations include: * Incorrect MIME type (must be text/plain) * Invalid syntax in the policy file

# Correct Format
version: STSv1
mode: enforce
max_age: 604800
mx: mail.example.com
mx: backup-mail.example.com

2. DNS Record Configuration

The _mta-sts TXT record must be properly formatted. Misconfigurations include: * Invalid record format * Missing or incorrect version field

# Correct Format
_mta-sts.example.com. IN TXT "v=STSv1; id=20230101T123456"

3. Mode Selection

Incorrect mode selection can either expose the organization to risks or cause unnecessary email delivery failures: * testing: No enforcement, only reporting * enforce: Strict enforcement of policy * none: Policy disabled

Jumping directly to enforce mode without testing can lead to email delivery outages.

4. Max Age Setting

Inappropriate max_age values can impact security and operational efficiency: * Too low (e.g., 300 seconds): Excessive DNS lookups and policy fetching * Too high (e.g., 31536000 seconds): Difficulty in policy updates during incidents

# Recommended range: 1-2 weeks (604800-1209600 seconds)
max_age: 604800

5. MX Pattern Matching

Incorrect MX patterns in the policy file can cause legitimate emails to be rejected:

# Too permissive
mx: *.example.com

# Too restrictive
mx: mail1.example.com

# Better approach - explicit listing
mx: mail1.example.com
mx: mail2.example.com
mx: backup.example.com

6. HTTPS Configuration

The MTA-STS policy must be served over a valid HTTPS connection. Common issues include: * Expired SSL certificates * Invalid certificate chain * Missing or incorrect SSL configuration * Non-functional redirect from HTTP to HTTPS

These misconfigurations can result in email delivery failures, reduced security posture, and increased vulnerability to man-in-the-middle attacks. Organizations implementing MTA-STS should carefully test configurations in testing mode before moving to enforce mode, and regularly monitor policy effectiveness through MTA-STS reporting.

Recommendation

To mitigate the risks associated with MTA-STS misconfigurations, consider the following recommendations:

  • Start with Testing Mode: Begin MTA-STS implementation in testing mode to monitor potential issues without affecting email delivery: 

    version: STSv1
mode: testing
max_age: 86400
mx: mail1.example.com

  • Implement Progressive Max Age Values: Use shorter max_age values initially and increase gradually, the recommended value is 1-2 weeks.

  • Regular Policy Monitoring:

  • Monitor MTA-STS reporting data for policy failures
  • Review SMTP TLS connection logs
  • Verify HTTPS certificate validity regularly

  • Check DNS record consistency across authoritative servers

  • Security Best Practices:

  • Use strong SSL certificates (2048-bit RSA or better)
  • Enable HTTP/2 for policy serving
  • Implement proper HSTS headers on the policy host

  • Maintain proper SPF, DKIM, and DMARC alignment

  • Operational Procedures:

  • Document MTA-STS configuration in your DNS change management process
  • Create incident response procedures for MTA-STS-related issues
  • Maintain backup mail servers in policy configuration

  • Test policy updates in a staging environment first

  • Planned Changes Strategy:

  • Start with policy in testing mode
  • Gradually increase max_age value
  • Monitor reporting data for issues
  • Switch to enforce mode after successful testing period
  • Maintain documentation of all changes and their impacts

These recommendations help ensure a robust and secure MTA-STS implementation while minimizing the risk of email delivery disruptions.

Standards

  • SOC2_CONTROLS:
    • CC_5_3
    • CC_6_1
    • CC_6_6
    • CC_6_7
    • CC_8_1
    • CC_9_1
  • GDPR:
    • ART_25
    • ART_32
  • OWASP_ASVS_L3:
    • V10_3_3
    • V1_1_5
  • PCI_STANDARDS:
    • REQ_1_3
    • REQ_4_1
    • REQ_12_2